Unravel the Living Philippine Mythology

 

Philippine Mythology: Orality, Cultural Perspective, and the Imperative of Inclusivity

So lets say it Philippine mythology is very confusing, even for Filipino people. Philippine mythology, a is a form of oral tradition, and stands as a testament to the cultural resilience and diversity of the Filipino people. Rooted in centuries of storytelling, these myths pulse with life, revealing a dynamic narrative tradition. However, the complexity and elusive nature of Philippine mythology make it challenging for foreigners, particularly those viewing it through a Eurocentric lens, to fully comprehend its depth and nuances. This essay delves into the orality of Philippine mythology, the impact of Western perspectives, and emphasizes the necessity of an inclusive approach while discouraging gatekeeping.

The Orality of Philippine Mythology

Mythology in general are orally passed down, the Philippine mythology unfolds through the ages primarily through oral transmission, carried by storytellers, elders, and shamans. This dynamic tradition, filled with poetic expressions and rhythmic storytelling, becomes an immersive experience, connecting listeners with their cultural roots. Unlike written texts, the oral tradition allows for a living, breathing narrative that adapts to the socio-cultural shifts within Filipino communities.

Cultural Perspective and the Eurocentric Gaze

Foreigners attempting to unravel the intricate layers of Philippine mythology often find themselves constrained by a Eurocentric and Western perspective. This perspective, shaped by colonial history and Western frameworks, may inadvertently lead to the misinterpretation or oversimplification of the myths. Viewing Philippine mythology through a Eurocentric lens risks missing the cultural nuances, spiritual dimensions, and symbiotic relationships embedded within the narratives. A more apt comparison lies in the rich mythological traditions of Hinduism and Buddhism, which share similarities with the fluid, dynamic nature of Philippine myths. The cyclical view of time, the interconnectedness of beings, and the prevalence of symbolic elements in these Asian mythologies provide a more suitable lens through which to appreciate and understand the complexities of Philippine mythology.

The Imperative of Inclusivity

Foreigners eager to engage with Philippine mythology should be cognizant of the need for an inclusive approach. Appreciating these myths requires more than linguistic understanding; it demands an openness to diverse perspectives and a willingness to transcend Eurocentric frameworks. Collaboration with native speakers, scholars, and community members becomes essential for a holistic comprehension of the myths, enriched by the cultural and spiritual contexts that may elude an outsider.

Beyond the Eurocentric Gaze:

Foreign perspectives on Philippine mythology often fall prey to Eurocentric interpretations, missing the unique cultural and linguistic nuances. Rather than approaching these myths through a European lens, a more illuminating exploration involves recognizing the indigenous perspectives and influences that have shaped these narratives over centuries. with excemption to foreign Anthropologist (who have studied and learned can speak and fully comprehend the language).

MYTHOLOGY NOT HISTORY

Foreign casual observers often tend to misinterpret Philippine mythology by erroneously perceiving it as historical fact, treating stories and accounts as literal occurrences. What they overlook is the fundamental distinction between mythology and history. While Philippine mythology may contain elements that echo fragments of reality, it is imperative to recognize that its essence is symbolic, not to be construed literally. Regrettably, foreigners often conflate mythology with history, failing to grasp the metaphorical nature inherent in these narratives.

The Spanish colonization of the Philippines in the 16th century brought about a profound clash of cultures, with the Spaniards imposing their religious beliefs on the indigenous people, branding their ancient gods, particularly the diwata, as demons (Demonios). Explores how the rich and diverse pre-colonial culture of the Philippines was stigmatized, leading to the enslavement and brainwashing of the local population, and how this historical narrative continues to influence perceptions in the modern era. In modern days foreigners who gatekeep and try to pit Filipinos againts each other about the gods and other mythologies.Reminiscent to the Spanish destruction and death to the old gods.

Philippine mythology

Discouraging Gatekeeping

The danger of gatekeeping arises when access to Philippine mythology is restricted or controlled by those who assert exclusive authority over its interpretation. Such practices can perpetuate a distorted understanding, hinder cultural exchange, and foster an atmosphere of exclusivity. It is crucial to recognize that mythology is a shared cultural heritage, and no single perspective can claim absolute authority over its interpretation.

Living Tradition: Mythologies are living traditions that continue to evolve. Local communities may reinterpret or adapt stories based on their contemporary needs and understanding. Foreign gatekeeping may hinder this natural evolution.

Yes Philippine mythology is confusing but it also adds to the appeal of it, Mythology is not a problem meant to be solved but a symbolic truth meant to be shared. In the intricate  and confusing web of Philippine mythology, the threads of orality, cultural perspective, and the imperative of inclusivity intersect, creating a narrative tapestry that defies easy comprehension. Foreigners, particularly those influenced by Eurocentric frameworks, should approach these myths with humility, acknowledging the limitations of their cultural lens. Embracing a view more akin to the fluidity of Hinduism and Buddhism, outsiders can appreciate the rich layers of meaning within Philippine mythology. Through collaborative efforts and a rejection of gatekeeping, we can ensure that these living threads continue to weave a story that transcends borders, fostering a deeper understanding and appreciation of the cultural richness encapsulated within Philippine mythology.

REMINDER

The orally transmitted mythology of the Philippines is intended for sharing and understanding, not for appropriation, commercial exploitation, or the promotion of foreigners and foreign products. It is a dynamic narrative tradition that evolves over time, distinct from the standardized mythologies found in Western and European cultures. Unlike these established mythologies, the Philippine government has not mandated standardized versions of stories and legends.

Orally transmitted stories undergo variations and evolve over time, resulting in numerous different versions. There are many different version told by Filipinos,and retold by Filipinos.

mutya ng calayo at lagblab

REAL ASWANGS

 

The demonized gods: Cultural Colonization and Spiritual Demolition in the Philippines

The Spanish colonization of the Philippines in the 16th century brought about a profound clash of cultures, with the Spaniards imposing their religious beliefs on the indigenous people, branding their ancient gods, particularly the diwata, as demons (Demonios). Explores how the rich and diverse pre-colonial culture of the Philippines was stigmatized, leading to the enslavement and brainwashing of the local population, and how this historical narrative continues to influence perceptions in the modern era.

The Spanish Expedition and Religious Imposition:

In 1525, King Charles I of Spain initiated an expedition to colonize the Maluku Islands, which eventually brought the Spaniards to the Philippines. Religious missionaries accompanied these expeditions, utilizing the cross as a symbol of religion and the sword as a tool of force. The Philippines, with its already flourishing cultural tapestry, became a battleground where indigenous gods were demonized to pave the way for the imposition of Christianity.

Enslavement and Brainwashing:

The derogatory labeling of the diwata as demons was a strategic move to undermine the indigenous spirituality and traditions. The Spaniards sought to portray the old gods and rituals as savage, paving the way for enslavement and the brainwashing of pre-colonial Philippine settlers. By deeming their beliefs as backward and demonic, the Spanish colonizers aimed to assert control over the psyche of the indigenous population.

Conversion and Local Interpretation:

The initial conversion to Christianity was slow, with only a hundred people baptized in the first five years of Spanish presence. However, as the Spanish foothold strengthened, conversions became more common. Notably, the early Filipinos interpreted Christianity through the lens of their Southeast Asian cultural practices, allowing them to articulate their own values, ideals, and hopes for liberation within the framework of the new religion.

Folk Catholicism and Resistance:

Folk Catholicism emerged as a response to the imposition of Christianity. The indigenous population incorporated their pre-Hispanic patterns of behavior into this new form of worship, creating a syncretic blend that allowed for both spiritual expression and resistance against colonial oppression. Christianity, from the perspective of the masses, became a progressive religion for the oppressed.

Elite Adoption and Socioeconomic Dynamics:

The first Christian converts often came from the elite, finding advantages in the new religion that reinforced existing social hierarchies. In a society where leadership was charismatic and constantly negotiated, the elite leveraged Christianity to legitimize their authority. The conversion of the elite contributed to the broader acceptance of the new faith.

ERADICATION OF THE OLD GODS

The ancient deities of the archipelago did not align with the Eurocentric perspectives and foreign ideologies embraced by the Spanish conquerors. Consequently, they sought to diminish the indigenous beliefs, inciting conflict among the people of the archipelago. This strategy served to strengthen and impose Western religious doctrines and cultural paradigms, with a specific emphasis on demonizing or eliminating the indigenous gods. In contemporary times, a similar dynamic persists as foreign entities, particularly through social media, employ analogous tactics, fostering division among Filipinos. This perpetuates a fragmentation of the essence and significance attributed to the ancient gods, as the socio-cultural fabric is strained by internal discord spurred by external influences.

Modern Implications:

Despite the centuries that have passed since the Spanish colonization, the impact on Filipino beliefs and social dynamics persists. Modern-day Filipinos, influenced by historical narratives, sometimes view their old gods as demons. Furthermore, there is an ongoing effort, particularly in the age of social media, to use colonial mentality to perpetuate the negative image of the old gods, fostering division among the Filipino people.

The tale of cultural colonization and spiritual demolition in the Philippines is one of complexity, resistance, and ongoing repercussions. The derogatory labeling of the diwata as demons was a pivotal moment in history, leading to the enslavement and brainwashing of the indigenous population. However, the resilience of the Filipino people, as seen in the development of folk Catholicism and ongoing efforts to reclaim cultural heritage, showcases a narrative of survival and cultural continuity against the forces of colonization. The modern-day struggles against colonial mentality and the negative portrayal of old gods highlight the enduring impact of historical narratives on contemporary Filipino society, the hope that new mythologies will emerge to revive the belief in the old gods, only to snuff out by foreigners same as in the old days. Death to the gods and all hail the Aswangs.